I think it really comes down to the complexity of the product. One agent sounds simpler for the user, but specialized agents could handle specific tasks much better. I’d probably start with one strong agent and only split things up when there’s a clear reason to. No point building a whole team of agents before you actually need one.

I agree with this. Automation is great, but consistency can be even more valuable in the long run. Having a system that follows the same process every time and doesn’t depend on someone remembering to do it can make a big difference. Sometimes the real benefit only becomes obvious once the agent is actually being used in production.

I think the biggest shift is that we’re starting to expect software to actually help us get the job done, not just give us tools to do it ourselves. But like you said, once an AI starts acting more like a teammate, reliability becomes a much bigger deal. I’d rather have an agent that knows when to ask for help than one that confidently does… Read more